Arrival & abandon or the town as erotic figure
From Christian Norberg-Schulz, The Concept of Dwelling, opening to chap. 2:
To settle in the landscape means to delimit an area, a place. We stop our wandering and say: Here! Then we create an "inside" within the encompassing "outside." The settlement is therefore a point of arrival. Still we may somewhere have the fine experience of approaching a settlement which waits for us like a "thing." First we may grasp the main outline and perhaps a dominant element, such as a steeple. Getting closer, the shape becomes more articulate, and begins to suggest something about what is hidden inside. Depending on where we come from, the experience varies. If we come through the forest it is different from coming across the fields or over the sea; but always we have the sense of having reached a goal. Like a magnet it attracts us, and arouses our expectations.From Madame Bovary:
How, then, does a settlement become a goal? The very experience of arrival implies a relationship to what is left behind. A goal does not exist in a vacuum; it is only a goal in relation to its environment. . . .
To serve as a goal, a settlement has to possess figural quality in relation to the surrounding landscape.
Gradually the four benches filled up, the coach rattled along, row upon row of apple trees flashed by; and the road, lined on each side by a ditch of yellow water, stretched on and on, narrowing toward the horizon.
Emma knew every inch of it: she knew that after a certain meadow came a road sign, then an elm, a barn, or a road-mender's cabin; sometimes she even shut her eyes, trying to give herself a surprise. But she always knew just how much further there was to go.
Finally the brick houses crowded closer together, the road rang under the wheels, and now the Hirondelle moved slowly between gardens: through iron fences were glimpses of statues, artificial mounds crowned by arbors, clipped yews, a swing. Then, all at once, the city came into view.
Sloping downward like an amphitheatre, drowned in mist, it sprawled out shapelessly beyond its bridges. Then open fields swept upward again in a monotonous curve, merging at the top with the uncertain line of the pale sky. Thus seen from above, the whole landscape had the static quality of a painting: ships at anchor were crowded into one corner, the river traced its curves along the foot of the green hills, and on the water the oblong shaped islands looked like great black fish stopped in their course. From the factory chimneys poured endless trails of brown smoke, their tips continually dissolving in the wind. The roar of foundries mingled with the clear peal of chimes that came from the churches looming in the fog. The leafless trees along the boulevards were like purple thickets in amongst the houses; and the roofs, all of them shiny with rain, gleamed with particular brilliance in the upper reaches of the town. Now and again a gust of wind blew the clouds toward the hill of Sainte-Catherine, like aerial waves breaking soundlessly agains a cliff.
A kind of intoxication wafted up to her from those closely packed lives, and her heart swelled as though the 120,000 souls palpitating below had sent up to her as a collective offering the breath of all the passions she supposed them to be feeling. In the face of the vastness her love grew larger, and was filled with a turmoil that echoed the vague ascending hum. All this love she, in turn, poured out onto the squares, onto the tree-lined avenues, onto the streets; and to her the old Norman city was like some fabulous capital, a Babylon into which she was making her entry. She leaned far out the window and filled her lungs with air; the three horses galloped on, there was a grinding of stones in the mud beneath the wheels; the coach swayed; Hivert shouted warningly ahead to the wagons he was about to overtake, and businessmen leaving their suburban villas in Bois-Guillaume descended the hill at a respectable pace in their little family carriages.
There was a stop at the city gate: Emma took off her overshoes, changed her gloves, arranged her shawl, and twenty paces further on she left the Hirondelle.
The city was coming to life. Clerks in caps were polishing shop windows, and women with baskets on their hips stood on street corners uttering loud, regular cries. She walked on, her eyes lowered, keeping close to the house walls and smiling happily under her lowered black veil.
For fear of being seen, she usually didn't take the shortest way. She would plunge into a maze of dark alleys, and emerge, hot and perspiring, close to the fountain at the lower end of the Rue Nationale. This is the part of town near the theatre, full of bars and prostitutes. Often a van rumbled by, laden with shaky stage-sets. Aproned waiters were sanding the pavement between the tubs of green bushes. There was a smell of absinthe, cigars and oysters.
Then she turned a corner. She recognized him from afar by the way his curly hair hung down below his hat.
He walked ahead on the sidewalk. She followed him to the hotel; he went upstairs, opened the door of the room, went in What an embrace!
Labels: architecture, excerpts


6 Comments:
on the concept of dwelling,
does someone who drives a car need a concept of road?
this is unnecessary theorising
and i think it's time that philosophers got out into the world, instead of sheltering in their dusty acadamies, and kicked down some of these theoretical sandcastles.
this Christian Norberg-Schulz hasn't read much Heidegger it seems, but just enough to sound like he's saying something. 'figural quality'! as home is a house for humans, well thanks for that...
sorry paul, if i sound like a bitter little boy. i am. all these people trying to play MY game! and play it so very badly.
still reading madame bovary calmed me down.
Chris, you've got to know I'm delighted to get a thinking reply from anyone informed where it's evident I'm not. Thanks for letting off a little steam! : )
Only wish I had more chance to hear views on these problems of theory & expression that would let me improve my own sense of the conflicts, of what's at stake in the language, its use & abuse.
This post is for fun, first, not so much for wisdom hope that's apparent and the weight's on the Flaubert, as I think you observe. But the little (very little) I've read from Norberg-Schulz (squarely within his mode of arch. theory done in this late-20th-cent. phenomenology frame) has been informing & provocative for me. I don't say I trust him much less that I approve his Heideggerianisms, which I'm very far from equipped to do in any case. The more interesting & potent for your own learning another's language is, I say, the less you should probably trust it. Especially if he's an architect or a philosopher. : )
But perhaps learning is precisely a matter of exposing yourself to what you don't trust, at bottom.
(If you want, by the way, see the earlier excerpts from Dwelling here and here. Don't hesitate to mention anything that seems problematic there. I'm interested.)
paul, your summary of learning is insightful and will be stolen by me for future use ;-)
although i got a bit carried away, i still stand by my first comment.
i'll have a look at some of norberg-schulz's stuff and try not to be so dismissive in the future (unlikely) especially as i'm only a student of philosophy (and liable never to be a master).
thanks for being interesting as always.
I'm gratified beyond expression (er .. nearly) to think you'd steal something from me.
Would have had no occasion to bring that thought forward, quite possibly, without your prodding above.
See? Reading Bovary makes me mad... even though the writing is beautifully done... the woman is such a mess, it just frustrates me!
I can understand that, J. About Madame Bovary my own thoughts are far from settled. There's a lot to be said about it. (Would wish to be a good deal more familiar with Flaubert & with the literature context, though, before trying to say what I think might want to be said.)
Worth considering, at any rate, that men & women alike are pretty much messes throughout the world of that story. And really, people of every sort, of 'good character' and 'bad,' take a beating all around there. (Excepting I think Hippolyte, the poor guy who loses his leg. He's practically a saint, the way the story works. — But only a minor figure like him could be.) In this light, maybe, it's easier to enjoy what Flaubert seems to hold up for enjoying in Emma.
Post a Comment
<< Home